Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

PHAB Data

 
Houston Health Department is tracking the following data for PHAB:
 
Indicator Objective Target Baseline Year Baseline Data
Age-Adjusted Death Rate Due to Diabetes
Reduce the age-adjusted death rate due to diabetes 19.1 deaths per/100,000 population 2017 19.8 deaths per/100,000 population
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair Reduce the rate of self-reported general health assessment: poor of fair by 3.6% by 2025 17.6% 2017 21.2%
Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate Due to Pediatric Asthma Reduce the rate of hospitalizations for asthma among children by 2.4 by 2021 8.7 hospitalizations per 10,000 children 2019 11.1 hospitalizations per 10,000 children
Adults who Smoke Reduce the rate of smoking among adults from 17.5% to 16.4% by 2023 16.4% 2017 17.5%
People with Low Access to a Grocery Store Decrease the percentage of people with low access to a grocery store by 1.1 percentage points by 2025 17% 2015 18.1%
 
 
Disclaimer: To make sure all of the PHAB Population Health Indicators have uniformity, we are using Harris County as the geographic level in this page. Click the indicators to see the trend line over time and breakdown by demographic factor and other available geographic units.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Reported PHAB Data

Reported PHAB Data

Reported PHAB Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Reported PHAB Data

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Harris

21.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.9.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 133 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (23.8), Harris has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(23.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Harris has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (21.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4).
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Reported PHAB Data

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Value
Compared to:

Reported PHAB Data

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Value
Compared to:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Harris

Current Value:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Harris

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (18.1%), Harris has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Reported PHAB Data

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Reported PHAB Data

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Smoke County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Harris

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (13.1%), Harris has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Mortality

Mortality

Mortality

Life Expectancy

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Life Expectancy

Value
Compared to:

Life Expectancy County: Harris

Current Value:

Life Expectancy County: Harris

77.9
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 77.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.2.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 237 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 77.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (77.2), Harris has a value of 77.9 which is higher and better.
TX Value
(77.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Harris has a value of 77.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Mortality

Infant Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Infant Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Infant Mortality Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Infant Mortality Rate County: Harris

5.9
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 5.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
TX Counties
(2015)
The distribution is based on data from 165 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (5.5), Harris has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Harris has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (5.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Harris

14.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 14.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (11.8), Harris has a value of 14.5 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Harris has a value of 14.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (14.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Harris

31.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 31.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.9.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 160 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 31.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (40.6), Harris has a value of 31.8 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Harris has a value of 31.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (31.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.9).
Prior Value
(30.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Harris

139.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 139.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 160.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 173.2.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 243 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 139.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (144.5), Harris has a value of 139.4 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(144.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Harris has a value of 139.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (139.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.6).
Prior Value
(141.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer County: Harris

13.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 13.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 147 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 13.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (13.7), Harris has a value of 13.4 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(13.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Harris has a value of 13.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (13.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.5).
Prior Value
(13.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack County: Harris

42.9
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 42.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 81.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 116.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 140 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (63.2), Harris has a value of 42.9 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (42.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.2).
Prior Value
(40.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Harris

11.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 11.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.1), Harris has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Harris has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (11.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1).
Prior Value
(12.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Harris

Current Value:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Harris

31.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 31.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.5%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (25.2%), Harris has a value of 31.2% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Harris has a value of 31.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (31.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.1%).
Prior Value
(32.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Harris

10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 10.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (13.5), Harris has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Harris has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6).
Prior Value
(10.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Mortality

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Mortality

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Harris

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Harris

18.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 18.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (14.0), Harris has a value of 18.2 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(14.0)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Harris has a value of 18.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health Related Quality of Life

Health Related Quality of Life

Health Related Quality of Life

HIV Diagnosis Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

HIV Diagnosis Rate

Value
Compared to:

HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Harris

24.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 24.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (14.5), Harris has a value of 24.9 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(14.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (24.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4).
Prior Value
(25.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Harris

583.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 583.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 323.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 452.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (508.2), Harris has a value of 583.5 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(508.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (539.9), Harris has a value of 583.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(539.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (583.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (571.4).
Prior Value
(571.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Harris

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (8.4%), Harris has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.8%), Harris has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Frequent Physical Distress

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Frequent Physical Distress

Value
Compared to:

Frequent Physical Distress County: Harris

Current Value:

Frequent Physical Distress County: Harris

13.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (10.6%), Harris has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Harris has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health Related Quality of Life

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Harris

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Harris

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (17.0%), Harris has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Harris has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cancer County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Harris

5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Harris has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Related Quality of Life

All Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

All Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

All Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

All Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

393.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 393.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 413.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 451.8.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 393.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (412.2), Harris has a value of 393.9 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(412.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Harris has a value of 393.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (393.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (397.3).
Prior Value
(397.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

111.5
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 111.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 111.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 120.7.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 203 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 111.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (116.3), Harris has a value of 111.5 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(116.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Harris has a value of 111.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (111.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (113.4).
Prior Value
(113.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Harris

36.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 36.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.2.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 192 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 36.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (37.1), Harris has a value of 36.6 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(37.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Harris has a value of 36.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (36.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.2).
Prior Value
(37.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Harris

8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (11.5%), Harris has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Harris has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Harris

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Harris

64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 64.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 64.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (66.0%), Harris has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Harris has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (64.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Babies with Low Birthweight

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Babies with Low Birthweight

Value
Compared to:

Babies with Low Birthweight County: Harris

Current Value:

Babies with Low Birthweight County: Harris

8.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 210 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (8.2%), Harris has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.1%), Harris has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Are Obese County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese County: Harris

33.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (36.1%), Harris has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Harris has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (33.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.1%).
Prior Value
(39.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Harris

62.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (69.8%), Harris has a value of 62.6% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(69.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.3%), Harris has a value of 62.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (62.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.1%).
Prior Value
(67.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults who Visited a Dentist

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Adults who Visited a Dentist

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Harris

59.6%
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (58.8%), Harris has a value of 59.6% which is higher and better.
TX Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Harris has a value of 59.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Related Quality of Life

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Harris

Current Value:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Harris

13.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.1%), Harris has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Harris has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (13.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health Related Quality of Life

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

Value
Compared to:

Health Related Quality of Life

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

Value
Compared to:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Harris

Current Value:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Harris

78.6%
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (80.8%), Harris has a value of 78.6% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(80.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (83.1%), Harris has a value of 78.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (78.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.6%).
Prior Value
(82.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Preventive Health Care

Preventive Health Care

Preventive Health Care

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months

Value
Compared to:

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months County: Harris

Current Value:

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months County: Harris

81.5%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (82.1%), Harris has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(82.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.6%), Harris has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (82.50%), the target has not been met.
HP 2020 Target
(82.50%)

Preventive Health Care

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Harris

65.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (69.0%), Harris has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.0%), Harris has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (65.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.7%).
Prior Value
(72.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Harris

68.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (66.0%), Harris has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
TX Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.6%), Harris has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (68.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.8%).
Prior Value
(72.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure County: Harris

74.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 74.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.5%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 74.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Harris has a value of 74.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Preventive Health Care

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Dentist Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Dentist Rate County: Harris

74
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 74 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 74 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (63), Harris has a value of 74 which is higher and better.
TX Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (74) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74).
Prior Value
(74)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Adults with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Adults with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Health Insurance County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults with Health Insurance County: Harris

73.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (77.6%), Harris has a value of 73.0% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(77.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Harris has a value of 73.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (73.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.4%).
Prior Value
(71.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Children with Health Insurance County: Harris

Current Value:

Children with Health Insurance County: Harris

87.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 87.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (89.1%), Harris has a value of 87.2% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Harris has a value of 87.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (87.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.4%).
Prior Value
(85.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Harris

70.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.6%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Harris has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Preventive Health Care

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Value
Compared to:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Harris

Current Value:

Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Harris

48.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 48.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (61.0%), Harris has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.8%), Harris has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(75.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (48.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (51.9%).
Prior Value
(51.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Health Care

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Health Care

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Harris

Current Value:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Harris

22.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (20.6%), Harris has a value of 22.8%.
TX Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Harris has a value of 22.8%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (22.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (22.7%).
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Individual Behavior

Individual Behavior

Individual Behavior

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Individual Behavior

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption County: Harris

Current Value:

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption County: Harris

35.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (38.6%), Harris has a value of 35.7% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (35.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Individual Behavior

Teen Births

Value
Compared to:

Individual Behavior

Teen Births

Value
Compared to:

Teen Births County: Harris

Current Value:

Teen Births County: Harris

1.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
TX Counties
(2014)
The distribution is based on data from 227 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (2.0%), Harris has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Harris has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Harris (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

Social Environment

Social Environment

Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Value
Compared to:

Substantiated Child Abuse Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Substantiated Child Abuse Rate County: Harris

5.2
Cases per 1,000 children
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 5.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 241 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (9.1), Harris has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.2), Harris has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.2 in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Compared to the prior value, Harris (5.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3).
Prior Value
(5.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

Social Environment

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Harris

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Harris

74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.7%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (75.1%), Harris has a value of 74.3% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(75.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Harris has a value of 74.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Harris

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Harris

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (1.0%), Harris has a value of 2.2% which is higher and better.
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Harris has a value of 2.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Social Environment

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Harris

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Harris

12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 12.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (10.7%), Harris has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Harris has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

High School Drop Out Rate

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

High School Drop Out Rate

Value
Compared to:

High School Drop Out Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

High School Drop Out Rate County: Harris

2.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 2.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.6%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (1.8%), Harris has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (2.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

Violent Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Violent Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

Violent Crime Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Violent Crime Rate County: Harris

730.4
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 730.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 234.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 350.7.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (420.4), Harris has a value of 730.4 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(420.4)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Harris has a value of 730.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (730.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (713.7).
Prior Value
(713.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Children in Single-Parent Households

Value
Compared to:

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Harris

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Harris

27.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 27.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 27.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (25.6%), Harris has a value of 27.4% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(25.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Harris has a value of 27.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Social Environment

Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Value
Compared to:

Voter Turnout: Presidential Election County: Harris

Current Value:

Voter Turnout: Presidential Election County: Harris

65.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 65.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.0%.
TX Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (66.7%), Harris has a value of 65.9% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(66.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (65.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.4%).
Prior Value
(58.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

Social Environment

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

Social Environment

Median Household Income

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Income County: Harris

Current Value:

Median Household Income County: Harris

$70,789
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of $70,789 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $59,778 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,800.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of $70,789 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value ($73,035), Harris has a value of $70,789 which is lower and worse.
TX Value
($73,035)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Harris has a value of $70,789 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Physical Environment

Physical Environment

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Harris

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Harris

$235,300
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of $235,300 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $142,050 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $105,275.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value ($238,000), Harris has a value of $235,300 which is lower and worse.
TX Value
($238,000)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Harris has a value of $235,300 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Employer Establishments

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Employer Establishments

Value
Compared to:

Employer Establishments County: Harris

Current Value:

Employer Establishments County: Harris

108,434
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Harris (108,434) is greater  than the previously measured value (105,710).
Prior Value
(105,710)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Harris

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Harris

89.8%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 89.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 243 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 89.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (81.8%), Harris has a value of 89.8% which is higher and better.
TX Value
(81.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Harris has a value of 89.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (89.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.0%).
Prior Value
(91.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Physical Environment

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Harris

Current Value:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Harris

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Harris has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Harris

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Harris

3
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Harris has a value of 3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (3) is less and better than the previously measured value (4).
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Housing Units

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Housing Units

Value
Compared to:

Housing Units County: Harris

Current Value:

Housing Units County: Harris

1,917,799
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Harris (1,917,799) is greater  than the previously measured value (1,885,105).
Prior Value
(1,885,105)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Liquor Store Density County: Harris

Current Value:

Liquor Store Density County: Harris

7.1
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 7.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8.
TX Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 184 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 7.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (7.2), Harris has a value of 7.1 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Harris has a value of 7.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (7.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.