Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

CHIP Priority 4: Infectious Disease

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

HIV Diagnosis Rate

Value
Compared to:

HIV Diagnosis Rate

Value
Compared to:

HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Harris

24.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 24.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (14.5), Harris has a value of 24.9 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(14.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (24.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4).
Prior Value
(25.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Annual Rate of New HIV Infections Census Place (City): Houston

Current Value:

Annual Rate of New HIV Infections Census Place (City): Houston

128.0
Rate per 100,000
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Houston (128.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56.0).
Prior Value
(56.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Harris

185.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 185.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 90.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 137.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (163.6), Harris has a value of 185.8 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(163.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (179.1), Harris has a value of 185.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(179.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (185.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (182.1).
Prior Value
(182.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Syphilis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Syphilis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Harris

12.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (8.8), Harris has a value of 12.0 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8), Harris has a value of 12.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (12.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0).
Prior Value
(7.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Harris

583.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 583.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 323.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 452.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (508.2), Harris has a value of 583.5 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(508.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (539.9), Harris has a value of 583.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(539.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (583.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (571.4).
Prior Value
(571.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Tuberculosis Incidence Rate County: Harris

Current Value:

Tuberculosis Incidence Rate County: Harris

5.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Harris has a value of 5.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (3.9), Harris has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(3.9)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4), Harris has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Harris (5.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7).
Prior Value
(5.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months County: Harris

Current Value:

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months County: Harris

81.5%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (82.1%), Harris has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(82.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.6%), Harris has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (82.50%), the target has not been met.
HP 2020 Target
(82.50%)

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months Census Place (City): Houston

Current Value:

Vaccine coverage rate for children 19-35 months Census Place (City): Houston

80.5%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Harris, TX County Value (81.5%), Houston has a value of 80.5% which is lower and worse.
Harris, TX County Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Harris County value.
Compared to the TX Value (82.1%), Houston has a value of 80.5% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(82.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.6%), Houston has a value of 80.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (82.50%), the target has not been met.
HP 2020 Target
(82.50%)

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Harris

68.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (66.0%), Harris has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
TX Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.6%), Harris has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (68.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.8%).
Prior Value
(72.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Harris

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Harris

65.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (69.0%), Harris has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.0%), Harris has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Harris (65.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.7%).
Prior Value
(72.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Harris

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Harris

11.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Harris has a value of 11.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.1), Harris has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Harris has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Harris (11.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1).
Prior Value
(12.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Harris value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.